Invest Radiol. 2012 Jun;476:376-82. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182539554.

Magnetic resonance evaluation of renal artery stenosis in a swine model: performance of low-dose gadobutrol versus gadoterate meglumine in comparison with digital subtraction intra-arterial catheter angiography.

Morelli JN1Runge VMAi FZhang WLi XSchmitt PMcNeal GMiller MLennox MWusten OSchoenberg SOAttenberger UI.

Author information

Abstract

PURPOSE:

The aim of this study was to compare low-dose imaging with gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine Gd-DOTA for evaluation of renal artery stenosis with 3-T magnetic resonance angiography MRA in a swine model.

METHOD AND MATERIALS:

A total of 12 experimental animals were evaluated using equivalently dosed gadobutrol and Gd-DOTA for time-resolved and static imaging. For time-resolved imaging, the time-resolved imaging with stochastic trajectories TWIST technique temporal footprint, 4.4 seconds was used; a dose of 1 mL of gadobutrol was injected at 2 mL/s and a dose of 2 mL of Gd-DOTA was injected at both 2 and 4 mL/s. For a separate static acquisition, doses were doubled. The static scans were used for stenosis gradation and the time-resolved scans for comparison of enhancement dynamics, signal-to-noise ratio SNR, and qualitative assessments.

RESULTS:

The average magnitude of difference in the stenosis measurements with static gadobutrol scans relative to digital subtraction intra-arterial catheter angiography mean [SD], 7.4% [5.6%] was less than with both the 2 mL/s 10.6% [6.2%] and 4 mL/s 11.5% [7.8%] Gd-DOTA MRA protocols. On time-resolved scans, peak signal-to-noise ratio was greatest with the gadobutrol protocol P < 0.05, and the gadobutrol TWIST scan was preferred to the TWIST Gd-DOTA scan in terms of image quality and stenosis visualization in every case for every reader.

CONCLUSION:

Low-dose gadobutrol ~0.05 mmoL/kg contrast-enhanced MRA results in improved accuracy of renal artery stenosis assessments relative to equivalently dosed Gd-DOTA at 3 T.

PMID: 22543971 DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182539554 [PubMed - indexed for MEDLINE]


| 回复

登录后进行回复

发新帖
  • 回复
  • 点评
  • 评分
  • 分享

推荐帖子