|
作者：Geoffrey D. Rubin, MD 作者单位：Duke Clinical Research Institute, 2400 Pratt St 本文发表于：Radiology: Volume 271: Number 3—June 2014 radiology.rsna.org 
1. Brooks B. Intra-arterial injection of sodium iodid: preliminary report. JAMA 1924; 82& #40;13& #41;:1016–1019.
2. Seldinger SI. Catheter replacement of the needle in percutaneous arteriography: a new technique. Acta Radiol 1953;39& #40;5 Suppl& #41;: 368–376.
3. Dumoulin CL, Hart HR Jr. Magnetic resonance angiography in the head and neck. Acta Radiol Suppl 1986;369:17–20.
4. Nishimura DG, Macovski A, Pauly JM. Magnetic resonance angiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1986;5& #40;3& #41;:140–151.
5. Wing VW, Federle MP, Morris JA Jr, Jeffrey RB, Bluth R. The clinical impact of CT for blunt abdominal trauma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985;145& #40;6& #41;:1191–1194. 6. Kalender WA, Seissler W, Klotz E, Vock P. Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath- hold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation. Radiology 1990;176& #40;1& #41;:181–183.
7. Crawford CR, King KF. Computed tomography scanning with simultaneous patient translation. Med Phys 1990;17& #40;6& #41;:967–982.
8. Rubin GD, Shiau MC, Schmidt AJ, et al. Computed tomographic angiography: historical perspective and new state-of-the-art using multi detector-row helical computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999; 23& #40;Suppl 1& #41;:S83–S90.
9. Napel S, Marks MP, Rubin GD, et al. CT angiography with spiral CT and maximum intensity projection. Radiology 1992;185& #40;2& #41;: 607–610.
10. Schwartz RB, Jones KM, Chernoff DM, et al. Common carotid artery bifurcation: evaluation with spiral CT. Work in progress. Radiology 1992;185& #40;2& #41;:513–519.
11. Vieco PT, Shuman WP, Alsofrom GF, Gross CE. Detection of circle of Willis aneurysms in patients with acute sub- arachnoid hemorrhage: a comparison of
12. CT angiography and digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165& #40;2& #41;:425–430. 13. Galanski M, Prokop M, Chavan A, Schaefer CM, Jandeleit K, Nischelsky JE. Renal arterial stenoses: spiral CT angiography. Radiology 1993;189& #40;1& #41;:185–192. 14. Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel SA, McDonnell CH, Jeffrey RB Jr. Three-dimensional spiral CT angiography of the abdomen: initial clinical experience. Radiology 1993;186& #40;1& #41;: 147–152. 15. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Wattinne L, Giraud F. Central pulmonary thromboem- bolism: diagnosis with spiral volumetric CT with the single-breath-hold technique— comparison with pulmonary angiography. Radiology 1992;185& #40;2& #41;:381–387. 16. Costello P, Ecker CP, Tello R, Hartnell GG. Assessment of the thoracic aorta by spiral CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158& #40;5& #41;: 1127–1130. 17. Polacin A, Kalender WA, Marchal G. Evaluation of section sensitivity profiles and image noise in spiral CT. Radiology 1992; 185& #40;1& #41;:29–35. 18. Remy J, Remy-Jardin M, Wattinne L, Deffontaines C. Pulmonary arteriovenous malformations: evaluation with CT of the chest before and after treatment. Radiology 1992;182& #40;3& #41;:809–816. 19. Schwickert HC, Schweden F, Schild HH, Renner C, Iverson PD. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary artery obstruction: CT diagnosis and follow-up after thrombend- arterectomy [abstr]. Radiology 1993; 189& #40;P& #41;:153. 20. Rubin GD, Dake MD, Napel S, et al. Spiral CT of renal artery stenosis: comparison of three-dimensional rendering techniques. Radiology 1994;190& #40;1& #41;:181–189. 21. Gavant ML, Menke PG, Fabian T, Flick PA, Graney MJ, Gold RE. Blunt traumatic aortic rupture: detection with helical CT of the chest. Radiology 1995;197& #40;1& #41;:125–133. 22. Rubin GD, Alfrey EJ, Dake MD, et al. Assessment of living renal donors with spiral CT. Radiology 1995;195& #40;2& #41;:457–462. 23. Van Hoe L, Baert AL, Gryspeerdt S, et al. Supra- and juxtarenal aneurysms of the abdominal aorta: preoperative assessment with thin-section spiral CT. Radiology 1996; 198& #40;2& #41;:443–448. 24. Rubin GD, Shiau MC, Leung AN, Kee ST, Logan LJ, Sofilos MC. Aorta and iliac arteries: single versus multiple detector-row helical CT angiography. Radiology 2000; 215& #40;3& #41;:670–676. 25. Fleischmann D. Contrast medium administration in computed tomographic angiography. In: Rubin GD, Rofsky NM, eds. CT and MR angiography: comprehensive vascular assessment. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009; 129–154.
26. Rubin GD, Schmidt AJ, Logan LJ, et al. Multi-detector-row CT angiography of lower extremity occlusive disease: a new application for CT scanning [abstr]. Radiology 1999; 210& #40;P& #41;:588.
27. Bogdan MA, Klein MB, Rubin GD, McAdams TR, Chang J. CT angiography in complex upper extremity reconstruction. J Hand Surg [Br] 2004;29& #40;5& #41;:465–469.
28. Achenbach S, Ulzheimer S, Baum U, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography by ret- rospectively ECG-gated multislice spiral CT. Circulation 2000;102& #40;23& #41;:2823–2828.
29. Vilacosta I, Román JAS. Acute aortic syndrome. Heart 2001;85& #40;4& #41;:365–368.
30. Hayter RG, Rhea JT, Small A, Tafazoli FS, Novelline RA. Suspected aortic dissection and other aortic disorders: multi-detector row CT in 373 cases in the emergency set- ting. Radiology 2006;238& #40;3& #41;:841–852.
31. Fleischmann D, Mitchell RS, Miller DC. Acute aortic syndromes: new insights from electrocardiographically gated computed tomography. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;20& #40;4& #41;:340–347.
32. Chin AS, Fleischmann D. State-of-the-art computed tomography angiography of acute aortic syndrome. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2012;33& #40;3& #41;:222–234.
33. WilliamsDM, CroninP, DasikaN,etal. Aortic branch artery pseudoaneurysms accompanying aortic dissection. Part II. Distinction from penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006;17& #40;5& #41;:773–781.
34. Hiratzka LF, Bakris GL, Beckman JA, et al.
2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/ SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with Thoracic Aortic Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American College of Radiology, American Stroke Association, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Interventional Radiology, Society of Tho- racic Surgeons, and Society for Vascular Medicine. Circulation 2010;121& #40;13& #41;:e266– e369. 35. Evangelista A, Mukherjee D, Mehta RH, et al. Acute intramural hematoma of the aorta: a mystery in evolution. Circulation 2005; 111& #40;8& #41;:1063–1070. 36. Chirillo F, Salvador L, Bacchion F, Grisolia EF, Valfrè C, Olivari Z. Clinical and ana- tomical characteristics of subtle-discrete dissection of the ascending aorta. Am J Cardiol 2007;100& #40;8& #41;:1314–1319. 37. Demers P, Miller DC, Mitchell RS, Kee ST, Chagonjian L, Dake MD. Stent-graft repair of penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers in the descending thoracic aorta: mid-term results. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77& #40;1& #41;:81–86. 38. Fleischmann D, Hallett RL, Rubin GD. CT angiography of peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006;17& #40;1& #41;:3–26. 39. Fleischmann D, Rubin GD. Quantification of intravenously administered contrast medium transit through the peripheral arteries: implications for CT angiography. Radiology 2005;236& #40;3& #41;:1076–1082. 40. Rubin GD. Data explosion: the challenge of multi-detector-row CT. Eur J Radiol 2000; 36& #40;2& #41;:74–80. 41. Ouwendijk R, Kock MC, van Dijk LC, van Sambeek MR, Stijnen T, Hunink MG. Vessel wall calcifications at multi-detector row CT angiography in patients with peripheral arterial disease: effect on clinical utility and clinical predictors. Radiology 2006; 241& #40;2& #41;:603–608. 42. Raman R, Napel S, Beaulieu CF, Bain ES, Jeffrey RB Jr, Rubin GD. Automated generation of curved planar reformations from volume data: method and evaluation. Radiology 2002;223& #40;1& #41;:275–280. 43. Roos JE, Fleischmann D, Koechl A, et al. Multipath curved planar reformation of the peripheral arterial tree in CT angiography. Radiology 2007;244& #40;1& #41;:281–290. 44. Schernthaner R, Stadler A, Lomoschitz F, et al. Multi-detector CT angiography in the assessment of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: accuracy in detecting the severity, number, and length of stenoses. Eur Radiol 2008;18& #40;4& #41;:665–671. 45. Chow LC, Napoli A, Klein MB, Chang J, Rubin GD. Vascular mapping of the leg with multi-detector row CT angiography prior to free-flap transplantation. Radiology 2005;237& #40;1& #41;:353–360. 46. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, et al. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease & #40;TASC II& #41;. J Vasc Surg 2007;45& #40;Suppl S& #41;:S5–S67. 47. 47. Met R, Bipat S, Legemate DA, Reekers JA, Koelemay MJ. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in peripheral arterial disease: a systematic re- view and meta-analysis. JAMA 2009; 301& #40;4& #41;: 415–424. 48. Collins R, Cranny G, Burch J, et al. A systematic review of duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease. Health Technol Assess 2007;11& #40;20& #41;:iii–iv, xi–xiii, 1–184. 49. Ouwendijk R, de Vries M, Pattynama PM, et al. Imaging peripheral arterial disease: a randomized controlled trial comparing contrast-enhanced MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography. Radiology 2005;236& #40;3& #41;:1094–1103. 50. SchernthanerR, FleischmannD, Lomoschitz F, Stadler A, Lammer J, Loewe C. Effect of MDCT angiographic findings on the management of intermittent claudication. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189& #40;5& #41;:1215–1222. 51. Pollak AW, Norton PT, Kramer CM. Multi- modality imaging of lower extremity peripheral arterial disease: current role and future directions. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012;5& #40;6& #41;:797–807. 52. Schernthaner R, Fleischmann D, Stadler A, Schernthaner M, Lammer J, Loewe C. Value of MDCT angiography in developing treatment strategies for critical limb ischemia. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;192& #40;5& #41;: 1416–1424. 53. Alvarez RE, Macovski A. Energy-selective reconstructions in X-ray computerized tomography. Phys Med Biol 1976;21& #40;5& #41;: 733–744. 54. Tran DN, Straka M, Roos JE, Napel S, Fleischmann D. Dual-energy CT discrimination of iodine and calcium: experimental results and implications for lower extremity CT angiography. Acad Radiol 2009; 16& #40;2& #41;:160–171. 55. Kau T, Eicher W, Reiterer C, et al. Dual- energy CT angiography in peripheral arterial occlusive disease-accuracy of maxi- mum intensity projections in clinical routine and subgroup analysis. Eur Radiol 2011;21& #40;8& #41;: 1677–1686. 56. Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HD. Trans- femoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 1991;5& #40;6& #41;:491–499. 57. Moore WS, Vescera CL. Repair of abdom- inal aortic aneurysm by trans-femoral endovascular graft placement. Ann Surg 1994; 220& #40;3& #41;:331–339; discussion 339–341. 58. Dake MD, Miller DC, Semba CP, Mitchell RS, Walker PJ, Liddell RP. Trans-luminal placement of endovascular stent-grafts for the treatment of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 1994; 331& #40;26& #41;:1729–1734. 59. Landry G, Lau I, Liem T, Mitchell E, Moneta G. Open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the endovascular era: effect of clamp site on outcomes. Arch Surg 2009;144& #40;9& #41;: 811–816.
60. Jaakkola P, Hippeläinen M, Farin P, Rytkönen H, Kainulainen S, Partanen K. Interobserver variability in measuring the dimensions of the abdominal aorta: comparison of ultrasound and computed tomography. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1996;12& #40;2& #41;:230–237.
61. Moritz JD, Rotermund S, Keating DP, Oestmann JW. Infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms: implications of CT evaluation of size and configuration for placement of endovascular aortic grafts. Radiology 1996; 198& #40;2& #41;:463–466.
62. Beebe HG, Jackson T, Pigott JP. Aortic an- eurysm morphology for planning endovascular aortic grafts: limitations of conventional imaging methods. J Endovasc Surg 1995;2& #40;2& #41;:139–148.
63. White RA, Donayre C, Kopchok G, Walot I, Wilson E, de Virgilio C. Intravascular ultrasound: the ultimate tool for abdominal aortic aneurysm assessment and endovascular graft delivery. J Endovasc Surg 1997; 4& #40;1& #41;:45–55. 64. Tillich M, Hill BB, Paik DS, et al. Prediction of aortoiliac stent-graft length: comparison of measurement methods. Radiology 2001;220& #40;2& #41;:475–483.
65. Fishman EK, Drebin B, Magid D, et al. Volumetric rendering techniques: applications for three-dimensional imaging of the hip. Radiology 1987;163& #40;3& #41;:737–738.
66. Rubin GD, Paik DS, Johnston PC, Napel S. Measurement of the aorta and its branches with helical CT. Radiology 1998;206& #40;3& #41;: 823–829.
67. RozenblitA, MarinML, VeithFJ, CynamonJ, Wahl SI, Bakal CW. Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm: value of post- operative follow-up with helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165& #40;6& #41;:1473–1479.
68. Armerding MD, Rubin GD, Beaulieu CF, et al. Aortic aneurysmal disease: assessment of stent-graft treatment-CT versus conventional angiography. Radiology 2000;215& #40;1& #41;: 138–146.
69. Roos JE, Hellinger JC, Hallet R, Fleischmann D, Zarins CK, Rubin GD. Detection of endograft fractures with multi-detector row computed tomography. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42& #40;5& #41;:1002–1006. 70. Golzarian J, Dussaussois L, Abada HT, et al. Helical CT of aorta after endoluminal stent-graft therapy: value of biphasic acquisition. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171& #40;2& #41;: 329–331. 71. Cornelissen SA, Prokop M, Verhagen HJ, Adriaensen ME, Moll FL, Bartels LW. Detection of occult endoleaks after endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm using magnetic resonance imaging with a blood pool contrast agent: preliminary observations. Invest Radiol 2010;45& #40;9& #41;:548–553. 72. Bley TA, Chase PJ, Reeder SB, et al. Endo- vascular abdominal aortic aneurysm re- pair: nonenhanced volumetric CT for follow-up. Radiology 2009;253& #40;1& #41;:253–262. 73. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. Trans- catheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 2010;363& #40;17& #41;: 1597–1607. 74. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, et al. Trans-catheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2011;364& #40;23& #41;:2187–2198. 75. Cribier A, Eltchaninoff H, Bash A, et al. Percutaneous transcatheter implantation of an aortic valve prosthesis for calcific aortic stenosis: first human case deion. Circulation 2002;106& #40;24& #41;:3006–3008. 76. Leon MB, Piazza N, Nikolsky E, et al. Standardized endpoint definitions for Trans- catheter Aortic Valve Implantation clinical trials: a consensus report from the Valve Academic Research Consortium. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57& #40;3& #41;:253–269. 77. Kodali SK, Williams MR, Smith CR, et al. Two-year outcomes after trans-catheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med 2012;366& #40;18& #41;:1686–1695. 78. Willson AB, Webb JG, Labounty TM, et al. 3-dimensional aortic annular assessment by multi-detector computed tomography predicts moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation after trans-catheter aortic valve replacement: a multicenter retrospective analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59& #40;14& #41;: 1287–1294. 79. Leipsic J, Gurvitch R, Labounty TM, et al. Multi-detector computed tomography in trans-catheter aortic valve implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2011;4& #40;4& #41;:416–429. 80. Blanke P, Schoepf UJ, Leipsic JA. CT in trans-catheter aortic valve replacement. Radiology 2013;269& #40;3& #41;:650–669. 81. Hamdan A, Guetta V, Konen E, et al. De- formation dynamics and mechanical properties of the aortic annulus by 4-dimensional computed tomography: insights into the functional anatomy of the aortic valve complex and implications for trans-catheter aortic valve therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59& #40;2& #41;:119–127. 82. Binder RK, Webb JG, Willson AB, et al. The impact of integration of a multidetec- tor computed tomography annulus area sizing algorithm on outcomes of trans-catheter aortic valve replacement: a prospective, multicenter, controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62& #40;5& #41;:431–438. 83. Jilaihawi H, Kashif M, Fontana G, et al. Cross-sectional computed tomographic assessment improves accuracy of aortic annular sizing for trans-catheter aortic valve replacement and reduces the incidence of paravalvular aortic regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59& #40;14& #41;:1275–1286. 84. Achenbach S, Moshage W, Bachmann K. Detection of high-grade restenosis after PTCA using contrast-enhanced electron beam CT. Circulation 1997;96& #40;9& #41;:2785–2788. 85. Garcia MJ, Lessick J, Hoffmann MH; CATSCAN Study Investigators. Accuracy of 16-row multi-detector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA 2006;296& #40;4& #41;:403–411. 86. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Di- agnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY & #40;Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography& #41; trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52& #40;21& #41;:1724–1732. 87. Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M, et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N Engl J Med 2008;359& #40;22& #41;:2324–2336. 88. Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52& #40;25& #41;:2135–2144. 89. Mowatt G, Cook JA, Hillis GS, et al. 64- Slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and me- ta-analysis. Heart 2008;94& #40;11& #41;:1386–1393. 90. Sun Z, Ng KH. Diagnostic value of coronary CT angiography with prospective ECG- gating in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta- analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012; 28& #40;8& #41;:2109–2119. 91. Achenbach S, Marwan M, Ropers D, et al. Coronary computed tomography angiogra- phy with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-trig- gered high-pitch spiral acquisition. Eur Heart J 2010;31& #40;3& #41;:340–346.
92. Taylor AJ, Cerqueira M, Hodgson JM, et al. ACCF/SCCT/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/ NASCI/SCAI/SCMR 2010 Appropriate Use Criteria for Cardiac Computed Tomography. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the Society of Cardio- vascular Computed Tomography, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society for Cardio- vascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation 2010;122& #40;21& #41;:e525–e555.
93. Litt HI, Gatsonis C, Snyder B, et al. CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2012;366& #40;15& #41;:1393–1403.
94. Hoffmann U, Truong QA, Schoenfeld DA, et al. Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. N Engl J Med 2012;367& #40;4& #41;:299–308.
95. Min JK, Kang N, Shaw LJ, et al. Costs and clinical outcomes after coronary multi-detector CT angiography in patients without known coronary artery disease: comparison to myocardial perfusion SPECT. Radiology 2008;249& #40;1& #41;:62–70.
96. Min JK, Shaw LJ, Berman DS, Gilmore A, Kang N. Costs and clinical outcomes in individuals without known coronary artery disease undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography from an analysis of Medicare category III transaction codes. Am J Cardiol 2008;102& #40;6& #41;:672–678.
97. Schwitter J, Wacker CM, Wilke N, et al. MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion- cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-pho- ton emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multi-centre, multivendor trial. Eur Heart J 2013;34& #40;10& #41;:775–781.
98. Vliegenthart R, Henzler T, Moscariello A, et al. CT of coronary heart disease: Part 1, CT of myocardial infarction, ischemia, and viability. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198& #40;3& #41;: 531–547.
99. Ruzsics B, Lee H, Powers ER, Flohr TG, Costello P, Schoepf UJ. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Myocardial ischemia diagnosed by dual-energy computed tomography: correlation with single-photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 2008;117& #40;9& #41;:1244–1245. 100. Arnoldi E, Lee YS, Ruzsics B, et al. CT detection of myocardial blood volume deficits: dual-energy CT compared with single-energy CT spectra. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2011;5& #40;6& #41;:421–429. 101. Scheske JA, O’Brien JM, Earls JP, et al. Coronary artery imaging with single-source rapid kilovolt peak-switching dual-energy CT. Radiology 2013;268& #40;3& #41;:702–709. 102. Gerber BL, Belge B, Legros GJ, et al. Characterization of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts by multi-detector computed tomography: comparison with contrast- enhanced magnetic resonance. Circulation 2006;113& #40;6& #41;:823–833. 103. Gerber TC, Carr JJ, Arai AE, et al. Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Circulation 2009;119& #40;7& #41;:1056–1065. 104. Bamberg F, Becker A, Schwarz F, et al. Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-based myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology 2011;260& #40;3& #41;: 689–698. 105. Wang Y, Qin L, Shi X, et al. Adenosine- stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;198& #40;3& #41;:521–529. 106. Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME & #40;Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multi-vessel Evaluation& #41; study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;56& #40;3& #41;:177–184. 107. Meijboom WB, Van Mieghem CA, van Pelt N, et al. Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow reserve in patients with stable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;52& #40;8& #41;:636–643. 108. Koo BK, Erglis A, Doh JH, et al. Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW & #40;Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve& #41; study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58& #40;19& #41;: 1989–1997. 109. Min JK, Leipsic J, Pencina MJ, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. JAMA 2012; 308& #40;12& #41;:1237–1245. 110. Taylor CA, Fonte TA, Min JK. Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61& #40;22& #41;: 2233–2241. 111. Min JK, Koo BK, Erglis A, et al. Usefulness of noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms for intermediate stenoses con- firmed by quantitative coronary angiography. Am J Cardiol 2012;110& #40;7& #41;:971–976. 112. Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 2007;298& #40;3& #41;:317–323. 113. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in child- hood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2012;380& #40;9840& #41;:499–505. 114. AAPM Position Statement on Radiation Risks from Medical Imaging Procedures. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. http://www.aapm.org/org/policies/ details.asp?id5318&type5PP. Published 2011. Accessed August 12, 2013. 115. Raff GL, Chinnaiyan KM, Share DA, et al. Radiation dose from cardiac computed tomography before and after implementation of radiation dose-reduction techniques. JAMA 2009;301& #40;22& #41;:2340–2348. 116. 116. Willemink MJ, Leiner T, de Jong PA, et al. Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography part 2: initial results in dose reduction and image quality. Eur Radiol 2013;23& #40;6& #41;:1632–1642. 117. Mayo J, Thakur Y. Pulmonary CT angiography as first-line imaging for PE: image quality and radiation dose considerations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200& #40;3& #41;:522–528.
|
